Peer Review Policy

The KALANJIYAM - International Journal of Tamil Studies is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of scholarly publishing through a stringent peer review process. This process not only ensures the quality and integrity of the research published but also promotes an environment of academic rigor and accountability. The following outlines the key components and importance of the peer review policy at KIJTS:

• Initial Submission and Editorial Oversight:
• Manuscripts submitted to KIJTS are initially reviewed and approved by the Editor-in-Chief.
• This step serves as a preliminary filter to assess the suitability of the manuscript for the journal and determine whether it aligns with the journal's scope and focus.
• Collaborative Peer Review Process:
• Following the initial approval, a formal peer review process is initiated, which involves collaboration with editorial board members and independent referees.
• This collaborative approach leverages the expertise of various scholars and professionals in the field, ensuring a thorough evaluation of the manuscript.
• Role of Reviewers:
• Independent referees are selected based on their knowledge and experience relevant to the manuscript's subject matter.
• Reviewers are responsible for scrutinizing the manuscript for originality, rigor of methodology, relevance to the field, and overall contribution to scientific knowledge.
• Encouragement of Electronic Submission:
• The publisher encourages authors and reviewers to utilize an electronic submission and peer-review system.
• This system facilitates a more efficient review process by enabling timely communication, expedited document sharing, and streamlined tracking of submissions.
• Feedback Mechanism:
• Reviewers provide constructive feedback and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.
• Authors are expected to address these comments, leading to a revised manuscript that better meets the standards of academic excellence.
• Ethical Standards:
• KIJTS adheres to a strict code of ethics throughout the peer review process, ensuring that all parties involved act with integrity, transparency, and respect for the confidentiality of the review process.
• Any potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed by both authors and reviewers to maintain the objectivity of the review.
• Publication Decision:
• After the peer review process is complete, the editor makes a final decision based on the reviewers' input.
• The possible outcomes include acceptance, acceptance with minor revisions, major revisions required, or rejection, each reflecting the manuscript's readiness for publication.
• Continuous Improvement:
• The peer review process is continuously evaluated and improved based on feedback from authors, reviewers, and editorial board members.
• KIJTS is committed to evolving its procedures to adapt to the changing landscape of academic publishing and to enhance the quality of the research it disseminates.

In conclusion, the peer review policy at the Academic Research Journal of Science and Technology is essential to preserving the integrity and quality of published research. By fostering a rigorous review process, KIJTS ensures that the work it publishes is not only credible but also contributes meaningfully to the advancement of science and technology. Such adherence to excellence enhances the journal’s reputation and the trust of its readership, ultimately driving the pursuit of knowledge within the academic community.